🏠 Home
Teaching
📚 All Courses Molecular Therapeutics (MOLD-405) Cell & Molecular Biology Special Topics Biomedical Sciences Syllabi 👤 About Me 🎓 CV / Download 📄 Publications 🛠 Services 🔬 Lab Resources ✍️ Blog 🎓 Student Portal ✉️ Contact 🌐 العربية
Schematic of the VOLGA design: three arms randomized 1:1:1 and treated before and after radical cystectomy, with durvalumab plus enfortumab vedotin, the same plus tremelimumab, or cystectomy alone
The three arms as described in the abstract (illustration prepared for this brief, not a figure from the paper).

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer is usually treated with chemotherapy that contains cisplatin before surgery, but many patients cannot take cisplatin or decline it. The phase 3 VOLGA trial tested a different approach for them: an immune checkpoint antibody, durvalumab, and an antibody-drug conjugate, enfortumab vedotin, around radical cystectomy. Compared with surgery alone, the combination gave better event-free survival, and the doublet also gave better overall survival.

Key numbers
ArmPatients24-month event-free survival (95% CI)Hazard ratio vs control (95% CI)P
Durvalumab + enfortumab vedotin23363.5% (56.5 to 69.7)0.51 (0.38 to 0.67)<0.001
Durvalumab + tremelimumab + enfortumab vedotin23360.1% (53.2 to 66.2)0.61 (0.47 to 0.80)<0.001
Control: cystectomy alone22945.1% (38.2 to 51.8)referencereference

Who was studied and what was given

VOLGA was an open-label trial sponsored by AstraZeneca. Patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who were ineligible for or declined cisplatin-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1:1. One group received neoadjuvant durvalumab with enfortumab vedotin every 3 weeks for three cycles, radical cystectomy, and then adjuvant durvalumab every 4 weeks for nine cycles. A second group received the same drugs with tremelimumab added, a CTLA-4 antibody given for two cycles before surgery and one cycle after. The control group had radical cystectomy alone. In total 233, 233 and 229 patients were assigned to the three groups. The trial registry lists patients with clinical stage T2 to T4aN0/1 disease, or T1N1, who had received no prior systemic treatment for it.

Why event-free survival

The two primary end points were event-free survival in each durvalumab group compared with the control group; the two durvalumab groups were not compared with each other. Event-free survival counts the time until disease recurs after surgery, progresses, surgery cannot be done because disease remains, or the patient dies. Overall survival was the key secondary end point.

Event-free survival was better in both durvalumab groups

Estimated event-free survival at 24 months was 63.5% (95% CI 56.5 to 69.7) with durvalumab and enfortumab vedotin, 60.1% (95% CI 53.2 to 66.2) with the tremelimumab triplet, and 45.1% (95% CI 38.2 to 51.8) with surgery alone. The hazard ratio for an event or death was 0.51 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.67; P<0.001) for the doublet and 0.61 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.80; P<0.001) for the triplet, each versus control.

Bar chart of estimated event-free survival at 24 months with 95% confidence intervals: control 45.1%, durvalumab plus enfortumab vedotin 63.5% (hazard ratio 0.51, 0.38 to 0.67), durvalumab plus tremelimumab plus enfortumab vedotin 60.1% (hazard ratio 0.61, 0.47 to 0.80)
Values as reported in the abstract (chart prepared for this brief, not a figure from the paper). The two durvalumab groups were not compared with each other. HR: hazard ratio for an event or death versus control.

Overall survival favored the doublet

Estimated overall survival at 24 months was 78.4% with durvalumab and enfortumab vedotin and 69.4% with surgery alone (hazard ratio for death 0.58; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.83; P=0.003). The abstract gives no overall survival comparison for the triplet, so none is reported here.

Serious adverse events were more common with treatment

Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 71.1% of patients with durvalumab and enfortumab vedotin (treatment-related in 30.7%), 79.5% with the triplet (treatment-related in 44.5%) and 50.2% with surgery alone. The authors note that grade 3 or higher events of any cause occurred in more than half of the patients in the durvalumab groups. The abstract does not give discontinuation rates or the types of events.

Bar chart of grade 3 or higher adverse events: control 50.2%; durvalumab plus enfortumab vedotin 71.1% with 30.7% treatment-related; durvalumab plus tremelimumab plus enfortumab vedotin 79.5% with 44.5% treatment-related
Values as reported in the abstract (chart prepared for this brief, not a figure from the paper). The abstract gives the treatment-related share for the two durvalumab groups only.

What it means and what it does not

The authors conclude that perioperative durvalumab with or without tremelimumab, plus three neoadjuvant cycles of enfortumab vedotin, gave significantly better event-free survival than surgery alone, and that the doublet gave better overall survival. The trial does not show which component matters most, because there was no arm without enfortumab vedotin, and it did not compare these regimens with cisplatin-based chemotherapy or with other immunotherapy-based standards. The trial was open-label, and the results apply to patients who could not or would not receive cisplatin. Longer follow-up is needed, and these regimens are for oncologists to weigh case by case.

Original paper
Paper
Powles T, Grande E, Simone G, et al. Durvalumab, tremelimumab, and enfortumab vedotin in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. N Engl J Med. 2026. Published October 24, 2026. VOLGA, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04960709.
Type
Phase 3 randomized open-label trial
DOI
10.1056/NEJMoa2608323
PubMed
PMID 42929692
Funding
AstraZeneca. EudraCT 2020-005452-38.
Dr. Abdelmuhsen Abusneina
Abdelmuhsen Abusneina, PhDAssociate Professor
Research focus: Molecular Oncology and Cancer Metabolism
Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of Benghazi, Libya

Weekly digest

The week's briefs and science news in one email. See the privacy policy.

← Back to the blog